Link of my 360-tour by Google Earth:

https://earth.google.com/earth/rpc/cc/drive?state=%7B%22ids%22%3A%5B%221_75059PsptxShHo7O-VuBIFlc5KmDMXY%22%5D%2C%22action%22%3A%22open%22%2C%22userId%22%3A%22108595015284630690379%22%2C%22resourceKeys%22%3A%7B%7D%7D&usp=sharing

I chose the SAMR model to evaluate the H5P video I created last week because after read and compared the detailed information of those two models, in my opinion, I think the H5P video I created last week best fits the Augmentation stage of the SAMR model. Based on the provided materials, the definition of the Augmentation stage is when the technology can directly be substituted for a traditional one and improve the student’s course experience sharply, in other words, this stage will use some new high-tech means to replace the original single lecture mode, such as additional information and multiple choices during the pauses in the H5P video. But it still can’t reach the deeper stage such as the Modification stage and the Redefinition stage because the H5P video didn’t provide enough information for higher-level of transformation to help the task redesign and brand new output. Those may be supplemented in the future study.

About the multimedia principles in my last week’s study, I think the Feedback Principle and the Modality principle were the two main principles that related to the H5P video. The Feedback principle had presented on the multiple choices poped-out during the H5P video, when the viewers answered the question, they can got the feedback about they did it right or wrong, it is also a way to ensure whether their learning is successful or not. The Modality principle had presented on the narrative style of the H5P video, I explained the text by myself and used real-time demonstration process as auxiliary, instead of just print text in the video, because I think the latter function may easily make people feel bored, people will unconsciously divert their attention, thus reducing the efficiency of learning.